Résultat de votre recherche

Infect Dis Now. 2021 Aug;51(5):407-409. doi: 10.1016/j.idnow.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 10.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:33984551 | DOI:10.1016/j.idnow.2021.05.001

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2021 Nov 1;22(11):e582-e587. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002750.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe and estimate the mortality rate of severe influenza-associated encephalopathy/encephalitis among children admitted to PICUs.

DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective study.

SETTING: Twelve French PICUs.

PATIENTS: All children admitted for influenza-associated encephalopathy/encephalitis between 2010 and 2018 with no severe preexisting chronic neurologic disorders and no coinfection potentially responsible for the disease.

INTERVENTION: None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We collected the clinical presentation; laboratory, electroencephalographic, and MRI findings; and treatments used in the PICU. The primary outcome was mortality. The secondary outcomes included sequelae at discharge and last follow-up. We included 41 patients with a median (interquartile range) age of 4.7 years (2.5-8.2 yr). The main reasons for admission were altered consciousness (59%) and status epilepticus (34%); 48% of patients had meningitis, and one third had acute necrotizing encephalopathy on MRI. Mechanical ventilation was required in 73% of patients and hemodynamic support in 24%. The use of specific treatments was variable; steroids were given to 49% of patients. Seven patients (17%) died in the PICU. Median (interquartile range) PICU stay length was 7 days (2-13 d), and total hospital length of stay was 23 days (7-33 d). On hospital discharge, 49% (n = 20) had neurologic sequelae, with 27% (n = 11) having severe disabilities defined by modified Rankin Score greater than or equal to 4.

CONCLUSIONS: Children requiring PICU admission for influenza-associated encephalopathy/encephalitis have high mortality and morbidity rates. The management remains highly variable due to the lack of guidelines.

PMID:33950890 | DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000002750

Arch Pediatr. 2021 May;28(4):325-337. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

ABSTRACT

In 2005, the French-speaking task force on pediatric critical and emergency care [Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d'Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP)] issued recommendations on withholding and withdrawing treatments in pediatric critical care. Since then, the French Public Health Code, modified by the laws passed in 2005 and 2016 and by their enactment decrees, has established a legal framework for practice. Now, 15 years later, an update of these recommendations was needed to factor in the experience acquired by healthcare teams, new questions raised by practice surveys, the recommendations issued in the interval, the changes in legislation, and a few legal precedents. The objective of this article is to help pediatric critical care teams find the closest possible compromise between the ethical principles guiding the care offered to the child and the family and compliance with current regulations and laws.

PMID:33875345 | DOI:10.1016/j.arcped.2021.03.004

Crit Care. 2021 Apr 12;25(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03562-0.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:33845883 | PMC:PMC8040196 | DOI:10.1186/s13054-021-03562-0

Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Nov 23;10(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00762-9.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Poisoning is one of the leading causes of admission to the emergency department and intensive care unit. A large number of epidemiological changes have occurred over the last years such as the exponential growth of new synthetic psychoactive substances. Major progress has also been made in analytical screening and assays, enabling the clinicians to rapidly obtain a definite diagnosis.

METHODS: A committee composed of 30 experts from five scientific societies, the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF), the Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence (SFMU), the Société de Toxicologie Clinique (STC), the Société Française de Toxicologie Analytique (SFTA) and the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d'Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP) evaluated eight fields: (1) severity assessment and initial triage; (2) diagnostic approach and role of toxicological analyses; (3) supportive care; (4) decontamination; (5) elimination enhancement; (6) place of antidotes; (7) specificities related to recreational drug poisoning; and (8) characteristics of cardiotoxicant poisoning. Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Analysis of the literature and formulation of recommendations were then conducted according to the GRADE^® methodology.

RESULTS: The SRLF-SFMU guideline panel provided 41 statements concerning the management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning. Ethanol and chemical poisoning were excluded from the scope of these recommendations. After two rounds of discussion and various amendments, a strong consensus was reached for all recommendations. Six of these recommendations had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and six had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). Twenty-nine recommendations were in the form of expert opinion recommendations due to the low evidences in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS: The experts reached a substantial consensus for several strong recommendations for optimal management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning, mainly regarding the conditions and effectiveness of naloxone and N-acetylcystein as antidotes to treat opioid and acetaminophen poisoning, respectively.

PMID:33226502 | PMC:PMC7683636 | DOI:10.1186/s13613-020-00762-9

Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Sep 7;10(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00713-4.

ABSTRACT

The French Society of Intensive Care Medicine (SRLF), jointly with the French-Speaking Group of Paediatric Emergency Rooms and Intensive Care Units (GFRUP) and the French-Speaking Association of Paediatric Surgical Intensivists (ADARPEF), worked out guidelines for the management of central venous catheters (CVC), arterial catheters and dialysis catheters in intensive care unit. For adult patients: Using GRADE methodology, 36 recommendations for an improved catheter management were produced by the 22 experts. Recommendations regarding catheter-related infections' prevention included the preferential use of subclavian central vein (GRADE 1), a one-step skin disinfection(GRADE 1) using 2% chlorhexidine (CHG)-alcohol (GRADE 1), and the implementation of a quality of care improvement program. Antiseptic- or antibiotic-impregnated CVC should likely not be used (GRADE 2, for children and adults). Catheter dressings should likely not be changed before the 7th day, except when the dressing gets detached, soiled or impregnated with blood (GRADE 2- adults). CHG dressings should likely be used (GRADE 2+). For adults and children, ultrasound guidance should be used to reduce mechanical complications in case of internal jugular access (GRADE 1), subclavian access (Grade 2) and femoral venous, arterial radial and femoral access (Expert opinion). For children, an ultrasound-guided supraclavicular approach of the brachiocephalic vein was recommended to reduce the number of attempts for cannulation and mechanical complications. Based on scarce publications on diagnostic and therapeutic strategies and on their experience (expert opinion), the panel proposed definitions, and therapeutic strategies.

PMID:32894389 | PMC:PMC7477021 | DOI:10.1186/s13613-020-00713-4

Euro Surveill. 2020 Jun;25(22):2001010. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.22.2001010.

ABSTRACT

End of April 2020, French clinicians observed an increase in cases presenting with paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS). Nationwide surveillance was set up and demonstrated temporospatial association with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic for 156 reported cases as at 17 May: 108 were classified as confirmed (n = 79), probable (n = 16) or possible (n = 13) post-COVID-19 PIMS cases. A continuum of clinical features from Kawasaki-like disease to myocarditis was observed, requiring intensive care in 67% of cases.

PMID:32524957 | PMC:PMC7336112 | DOI:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.22.2001010

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2020 Jun;21(6):e342-e353. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002307.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe the management of anemia at PICU discharge by pediatric intensivists.

DESIGN: Self-administered, online, scenario-based survey.

SETTING: PICUs in Australia/New Zealand, Europe, and North America.

SUBJECTS: Pediatric intensivists.

INTERVENTIONS: None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Respondents were asked to report their decisions regarding RBC transfusions, iron, and erythropoietin prescription to children ready to be discharged from PICU, who had been admitted for hemorrhagic shock, cardiac surgery, craniofacial surgery, and polytrauma. Clinical and biological variables were altered separately in order to assess their effect on the management of anemia. Two-hundred seventeen responses were analyzed. They reported that the mean (± SEM) transfusion threshold was a hemoglobin level of 6.9 ± 0.09 g/dL after hemorrhagic shock, 7.6 ± 0.10 g/dL after cardiac surgery, 7.0 ± 0.10 g/dL after craniofacial surgery, and 7.0 ± 0.10 g/dL after polytrauma (p < 0.001). The most important increase in transfusion threshold was observed in the presence of a cyanotic heart disease (mean increase ranging from 1.80 to 2.30 g/dL when compared with baseline scenario) or left ventricular dysfunction (mean increase, 1.41-2.15 g/dL). One third of respondents stated that they would not prescribe iron at PICU discharge, regardless of the hemoglobin level or the baseline scenario. Most respondents (69.4-75.0%, depending on the scenario) did not prescribe erythropoietin.

CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric intensivists state that they use restrictive transfusion strategies at PICU discharge similar to those they use during the acute phase of critical illness. Supplemental iron is less frequently prescribed than RBCs, and prescription of erythropoietin is uncommon. Optimal management of post-PICU anemia is currently unknown. Further studies are required to highlight the consequences of this anemia and to determine appropriate management.

PMID:32217901 | DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000002307

JAMA. 2019 Dec 10;322(22):2179-2190. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.17478.

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: The clinical consequences of red blood cell storage age for critically ill pediatric patients have not been examined in a large, randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the transfusion of fresh red blood cells (stored ≤7 days) reduced new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome compared with the use of standard-issue red blood cells in critically ill children.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Age of Transfused Blood in Critically-Ill Children trial was an international, multicenter, blinded, randomized clinical trial, performed between February 2014 and November 2018 in 50 tertiary care centers. Pediatric patients between the ages of 3 days and 16 years were eligible if the first red blood cell transfusion was administered within 7 days of intensive care unit admission. A total of 15 568 patients were screened, and 13 308 were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either fresh or standard-issue red blood cells. A total of 1538 patients were randomized with 768 patients in the fresh red blood cell group and 770 in the standard-issue group.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, measured for 28 days or to discharge or death.

RESULTS: Among 1538 patients who were randomized, 1461 patients (95%) were included in the primary analysis (median age, 1.8 years; 47.3% girls), in which there were 728 patients randomized to the fresh red blood cell group and 733 to the standard-issue group. The median storage duration was 5 days (interquartile range [IQR], 4-6 days) in the fresh group vs 18 days (IQR, 12-25 days) in the standard-issue group (P < .001). There were no significant differences in new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome between fresh (147 of 728 [20.2%]) and standard-issue red blood cell groups (133 of 732 [18.2%]), with an unadjusted absolute risk difference of 2.0% (95% CI, -2.0% to 6.1%; P = .33). The prevalence of sepsis was 25.8% (160 of 619) in the fresh group and 25.3% (154 of 608) in the standard-issue group. The prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome was 6.6% (41 of 619) in the fresh group and 4.8% (29 of 608) in the standard-issue group. Intensive care unit mortality was 4.5% (33 of 728) in the fresh group vs 3.5 % (26 of 732) in the standard-issue group (P = .34).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among critically ill pediatric patients, the use of fresh red blood cells did not reduce the incidence of new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (including mortality) compared with standard-issue red blood cells.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01977547.

PMID:31821429 | PMC:PMC7081749 | DOI:10.1001/jama.2019.17478