Résultat de votre recherche

J Med Ethics. 2007 Mar;33(3):128-33. doi: 10.1136/jme.2006.015990.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility of the guidelines of the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgence Pédiatriques (French-speaking group of paediatric intensive and emergency care; GFRUP) for limitation of treatments in the paediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

DESIGN: A 2-year prospective survey.

SETTING: A 12-bed PICU at the Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Lille, France.

PATIENTS: Were included when limitation of treatments was expected.

RESULTS: Of 967 children admitted, 55 were included with a 2-day median delay. They were younger than others (24 v 60 months), had a higher paediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) score (14 v 4), and a higher paediatric overall performance category (POPC) score at admission (2 v 1); all p<0.002. 34 (50% of total deaths) children died. A limitation decision was made without meeting for 7 children who died: 6 received do-not-resuscitate orders (DNROs) and 1 received withholding decision. Decision-making meetings were organised for 31 children, and the following decisions were made: 12 DNROs (6 deaths and 6 survivals), 4 withholding (1 death and 3 survivals), with 14 withdrawing (14 deaths) and 1 continuing treatment (survival). After limitation, 21 (31% of total deaths) children died and 10 survived (POPC score 4). 13 procedures were interrupted because of death and 11 because of clinical improvement (POPC score 4). Parents' opinions were obtained after 4 family conferences (for a total of 110 min), 3 days after inclusion. The first meeting was planned for 6 days after inclusion and held on the 7th day after inclusion; 80% of parents were immediately informed of the decision, which was implemented after half a day.

CONCLUSIONS: GFRUPs procedure was applicable in most cases. The main difficulties were anticipating the correct date for the meeting and involving nurses in the procedure. Children for whom the procedure was interrupted because of clinical improvement and who survived in poor condition without a formal decision pointed out the need for medical criteria for questioning, which should systematically lead to a formal decision-making process.

PMID:17329379 | PMC:PMC2598266 | DOI:10.1136/jme.2006.015990

Arch Pediatr. 2014 Jul;21(7):790-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

ABSTRACT

Minor head trauma is a common cause for pediatric emergency department visits. In 2009, the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) published a clinical prediction rule for identifying children at very low risk of clinically important traumatic brain injuries (ciTBI) and for reducing CT use because of malignancy induced by ionizing radiation. The prediction rule for ciTBI was derived and validated on 42,412 children in a prospective cohort study. The Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence (French Emergency Medicine Society) and the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgences Pédiatriques (French-Language Pediatric Emergency Care Group) recommend this algorithm for the management of children after minor head trauma. Based on clinical variables (history, symptoms, and physical examination findings), the algorithm assists in medical decision-making: CT scan, hospitalization for observation or discharge, according to three levels of ciTBI risk (high, intermediate, or low risk). The prediction rule sensitivity for children younger than 2 years is 100 % [86.3-100] and for those aged 2 years and older it is 96.8 % [89-99.6]. Our aim is to present these new recommendations for the management of children after minor head trauma.

PMID:24935453 | DOI:10.1016/j.arcped.2014.04.015

J Nephrol. 2023 Dec;36(9):2541-2547. doi: 10.1007/s40620-023-01762-1. Epub 2023 Sep 12.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Use of continuous renal replacement therapy in children receiving anti-infective drugs may lead to inappropriate concentrations with risks related to treatment failure, toxicity and emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria. We aimed to describe anti-infective prescribing practices in critically ill children undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

METHODS: An online survey to assess continuous renal replacement therapy, anti-infective prescribing and therapeutic drug monitoring practices was sent by e-mail to physicians working in pediatric intensive care units through the French-speaking Group of Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergency medicine (GFRUP).

RESULTS: From April 1st, 2021 to May 1st, 2021, 26/40 pediatric intensive care units participated in the survey, corresponding to a response rate of 65%. Twenty-one were located in France and five abroad. All pediatric intensive care units administered continuous renal replacement therapy, primarily with Prismaflex™ System. Anti-infective prescriptions were adjusted to the presence of continuous renal replacement therapy in 23 (88%) pediatric intensive care units mainly according to molecular weight in 6 (23%), molecule protein binding in 6 (23%) and elimination routes in 15 (58%) including residual diuresis in 9 (35%), to the continuous renal replacement therapy flow in 6 (23%) and to the modality of continuous renal replacement therapy used in 15 (58%), pediatric intensive care units. There was broad variability among pediatric intensive care units and among physicians within the same unit. Barriers to therapeutic drug monitoring were mainly an excessive delay in obtaining results in 11 (42%) and the lack of an on-site laboratory in 8 (31%) pediatric intensive care units.

CONCLUSIONS: Our survey reported wide variability in anti-infective prescribing practices in children undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy, thus highlighting a gap in knowledge and the need for education and recommendations.

PMID:37698831 | DOI:10.1007/s40620-023-01762-1

J Eval Clin Pract. 2018 Aug;24(4):767-771. doi: 10.1111/jep.12984. Epub 2018 Jul 10.

ABSTRACT

Selected variables for the French Paediatric Intensive Care registry.

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: Providing quality care requires follow-up in regard to clinical and economic activities. Over the past decade, medical databases and patient registries have expanded considerably, particularly in paediatric critical care medicine (eg, the Paediatric Intensive Care Audit Network (PICANet) in the UK, the Australian and New Zealand Paediatric Intensive Care (ANZPIC) Registry in Australia and New Zealand, and the Virtual Paediatric Intensive Care Unit Performance System (VPS) in the USA). Such a registry is not yet available in France. The aim of this study was to determine variables that ought to be included in a French paediatric critical care registry.

METHODS: Variables, items, and subitems from 3 foreign registries and 2 French local databases were used. Items described each variable, and subitems described items. The Delphi method was used to evaluate and rate 65 variables, 90 items, and 17 subitems taking into account importance or relevance based on input from 28 French physicians affiliated with the French Paediatric Critical Care Group. Two ratings were used between January and May 2013.

RESULTS: Fifteen files from 10 paediatric intensive care units were included. Out of 65 potential variables, 48 (74%) were considered to be indispensable, 16 (25%) were considered to be optional, and 1 (2%) was considered to be irrelevant. Out of 90 potential items, 62 (69%) were considered to be relevant, 23 (26%) were considered to be of little relevance, and 5 (6%) were considered to be irrelevant. Out of 17 potential subitems, 9 (53%) were considered to be relevant, 6 (35%) were considered to be of little relevance, and 2 (12%) were considered to be irrelevant.

CONCLUSIONS: The necessary variables that ought to be included in a French paediatric critical care registry were identified. The challenge now is to develop the French registry for paediatric intensive care units.

PMID:29987866 | PMC:PMC6174952 | DOI:10.1111/jep.12984

Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2021 Dec;40(6):100971. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100971. Epub 2021 Oct 30.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients under extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are at high risk of developing acute kidney injury and renal replacement therapy (RRT) is frequently needed. The aim of this study was to explore RRT use in ECMO patients, as no recommendations exist in this setting.

METHODS: An online questionnaire about RRT management in ECMO patients was sent to the members of the ARCOTHOVA (Anesthésie-Réanimation Coeur-Thorax-Vaisseaux) association and to the GFRUP (Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgences Pédiatriques).

RESULTS: Ninety intensivists from adult ICU and twenty from paediatric ICU responded to the questionnaire. RRT use was common as 67% respondents reported that more than 25% of their ECMO patients needed RRT. RRT indications were similar between centres, with persistent anuria (83%), metabolic acidosis (80%), fluid overload (78%) and hyperkalaemia (80%) being the more prevalent. Continuous renal replacement therapy was the preferred technique (97%). Continuous veno-venous haemofiltration was predominant (64%) over continuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration (21%). Unfractionated heparin was employed as first line choice anticoagulation in 61% and regional citrate anticoagulation in 16%. Integration of RRT device directly into the ECMO circuit was the preferred configuration (40%) while parallel systems with separate catheter were used in 30%. When the integrated approach was chosen, RRT device was most frequently connected with inlet and outlet lines after the ECMO pump (58%) and pressure alarms were encountered for 60% of participants.

CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the high variability of practice between centres. They suggest the need to compare the integrated and parallel configurations of combining RRT and ECMO.

PMID:34728410 | DOI:10.1016/j.accpm.2021.100971

J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2023 Apr 28;12(4):189-197. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piad010.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The severity of SARS-CoV-2-related diseases in children remains unclear. This study aimed to describe the incidence of French pediatric intensive care units (PICUs) admissions with acute COVID-19, incidental positive SARS-CoV-2 test result, and multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C) during the delta and omicron variant periods.

METHODS: This study used the French PICU registry to obtain data on all patients admitted to 41 French PICUs diagnosed with acute COVID-19, incidental positive SARS-CoV-2 test result, or MIS-C between August 30, 2021 and April 20, 2022. Data regarding the total number of positive SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction results according to the type of variants were obtained from the French National Public Health Agency.

RESULTS: Of 745 children, 244 (32.8%) were admitted for acute COVID-19, 246 (33.0%) for incidental positive SARS-CoV-2 test results, and 255 (34.2%) for MIS-C. The incidence of each group was higher with delta than with omicron. The incidence rate ratios with the delta variant were 7.47 (95% CI, 4.22-13.26) for acute COVID-19, 4·78 (95% CI, 2.30-9.94) for incidental positive SARS-CoV-2 test results, and 10.46 (95% CI, 5.98-18.31) for MIS-C compared to the omicron variant. The median age was 66 (7.7-126.8) months; 314 (42%) patients had comorbidities. Patients with acute COVID-19 and incidental positive SARS-CoV-2 test results had similar proportions of comorbidities. No patient with MIS-C died, whereas the mortality rates in the acute COVID-19 and incidental positive SARS-CoV-2 test results groups were 6.8% and 3.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of acute COVID-19, incidental positive SARS-CoV-2 test results, and MIS-C admitted to the PICU were significantly higher with the delta variant than with the omicron variant.

PMID:36786499 | DOI:10.1093/jpids/piad010

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2017 Aug;18(8):758-763. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001182.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: A recent task force has proposed the use of Sequential Organ Failure Assessment in clinical criteria for sepsis in adults. We sought to evaluate the predictive validity for PICU mortality of the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 and of the "quick" Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 scores on day 1 in children with suspected infection.

DESIGN: Secondary analysis of the database used for the development and validation of the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2.

SETTINGS: Nine university-affiliated PICUs in Europe.

PATIENTS: Only children with hypotension-low systolic blood pressure or low mean blood pressure using age-adapted cutoffs-and lactatemia greater than 2 mmol/L were considered in shock.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We developed the quick Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 score on day 1 including tachycardia, hypotension, and altered mentation (Glasgow < 11): one point for each variable (range, 0-3). Outcome was mortality at PICU discharge. Discrimination (Area under receiver operating characteristic curve-95% CI) and calibration (goodness of fit test) of the scores were studied. This study included 862 children with suspected infection (median age: 12.3 mo; mortality: n = 60 [7.0%]). Area under the curve of the Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 score on day 1 was 0.91 (0.86-0.96) in children with suspected infection, 0.88 (0.79-0.96) in those with low systolic blood pressure and hyperlactatemia, and 0.91 (0.85-0.97) in those with low mean blood pressure and hyperlactatemia; calibration p value was 0.03, 0.36, and 0.49, respectively. A Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 score on day 1 greater than or equal to 8 reflected an overall risk of mortality greater than or equal to 9.3% in children with suspected infection. Area under the curve of the quick Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 score on day 1 was 0.82 (0.76-0.87) with systolic blood pressure or mean blood pressure; calibration p value was 0.89 and 0.72, respectively. A score greater than or equal to 2 reflected a mortality risk greater than or equal to 19.8% with systolic blood pressure and greater than or equal to 15.9% with mean blood pressure.

CONCLUSION: Among children admitted to PICU with suspected infection, Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 score on day 1 was highly predictive of PICU mortality suggesting its use to standardize definitions and diagnostic criteria of pediatric sepsis. Further studies are needed to determine the usefulness of the quick Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2 score on day 1 outside of the PICU.

PMID:28492402 | DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000001182

Intensive Care Med. 2011 Oct;37(10):1648-55. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2320-3. Epub 2011 Aug 16.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Our goal is to assess the prevalence of questioning about the appropriateness of initiating or maintaining life-sustaining treatments (LST) in French-speaking paediatric intensive care units (PICUs) and to evaluate time utilisation related to decision-making processes (DMP).

METHODS: 18-month, multicentre, prospective, descriptive, observational study in 15 French-speaking PICUs.

RESULTS: Among the 5,602 children admitted, 410 died (7.3%), including 175 after forgoing LST (42.7% of deaths). LST was questioned in 308 children (5.5%) with a prevalence of 13.3 per 100 patient-days. More than 30% of children survived despite the appropriateness of LST being questioned (23% despite a decision to forgo treatment). Median caregiver time spent on making and presenting the decisions was 11 h per child.

CONCLUSIONS: In this study, on any given day in each 10-bed PICU, there was more than one child for whom a DMP was underway. Of children, 23% survived despite a decision to forgo LST being made, which underlines the need to elaborate a care plan for these children. Also, DMP represented a large amount of staff time that is undervalued but necessary to ensure optimal palliative practice in PICU.

PMID:21845503 | PMC:PMC5663736 | DOI:10.1007/s00134-011-2320-3

Ann Intensive Care. 2018 Nov 3;8(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s13613-018-0444-0.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine and the French Society of Intensive Care edited guidelines focused on hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) in intensive care unit. The goal of 16 French-speaking experts was to produce a framework enabling an easier decision-making process for intensivists.

RESULTS: The guidelines were related to 3 specific areas related to HAP (prevention, diagnosis and treatment) in 4 identified patient populations (COPD, neutropenia, post-operative and paediatric). The literature analysis and the formulation of the guidelines were conducted according to the Grade of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. An extensive literature research over the last 10 years was conducted based on publications indexed in PubMed™ and Cochrane™ databases.

CONCLUSIONS: HAP should be prevented by a standardised multimodal approach and the use of selective digestive decontamination in units where multidrug-resistant bacteria prevalence was below 20%. Diagnosis relies on clinical assessment and microbiological findings. Monotherapy, in the absence of risk factors for multidrug-resistant bacteria, non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli and/or increased mortality (septic shock, organ failure), is strongly recommended. After microbiological documentation, it is recommended to reduce the spectrum and to prefer monotherapy for the antibiotic therapy of HAP, including for non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli.

PMID:30392084 | PMC:PMC6215539 | DOI:10.1186/s13613-018-0444-0

Infect Dis Now. 2021 Aug;51(5):407-409. doi: 10.1016/j.idnow.2021.05.001. Epub 2021 May 10.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:33984551 | DOI:10.1016/j.idnow.2021.05.001