Résultat de votre recherche

Intensive Care Med. 2023 Jan;49(1):5-25. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06918-4. Epub 2023 Jan 2.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: We present guidelines for the management of infants under 12 months of age with severe bronchiolitis with the aim of creating a series of pragmatic recommendations for a patient subgroup that is poorly individualized in national and international guidelines.

METHODS: Twenty-five French-speaking experts, all members of the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgence Pédiatriques (French-speaking group of paediatric intensive and emergency care; GFRUP) (Algeria, Belgium, Canada, France, Switzerland), collaborated from 2021 to 2022 through teleconferences and face-to-face meetings. The guidelines cover five areas: (1) criteria for admission to a pediatric critical care unit, (2) environment and monitoring, (3) feeding and hydration, (4) ventilatory support and (5) adjuvant therapies. The questions were written in the Patient-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome (PICO) format. An extensive Anglophone and Francophone literature search indexed in the MEDLINE database via PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane and Embase was performed using pre-established keywords. The texts were analyzed and classified according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology. When this method did not apply, an expert opinion was given. Each of these recommendations was voted on by all the experts according to the Delphi methodology.

RESULTS: This group proposes 40 recommendations. The GRADE methodology could be applied for 17 of them (3 strong, 14 conditional) and an expert opinion was given for the remaining 23. All received strong approval during the first round of voting.

CONCLUSION: These guidelines cover the different aspects in the management of severe bronchiolitis in infants admitted to pediatric critical care units. Compared to the different ways to manage patients with severe bronchiolitis described in the literature, our original work proposes an overall less invasive approach in terms of monitoring and treatment.

PMID:36592200 | DOI:10.1007/s00134-022-06918-4

JAMA. 2019 Dec 10;322(22):2179-2190. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.17478.

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: The clinical consequences of red blood cell storage age for critically ill pediatric patients have not been examined in a large, randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the transfusion of fresh red blood cells (stored ≤7 days) reduced new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome compared with the use of standard-issue red blood cells in critically ill children.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The Age of Transfused Blood in Critically-Ill Children trial was an international, multicenter, blinded, randomized clinical trial, performed between February 2014 and November 2018 in 50 tertiary care centers. Pediatric patients between the ages of 3 days and 16 years were eligible if the first red blood cell transfusion was administered within 7 days of intensive care unit admission. A total of 15 568 patients were screened, and 13 308 were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive either fresh or standard-issue red blood cells. A total of 1538 patients were randomized with 768 patients in the fresh red blood cell group and 770 in the standard-issue group.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome, measured for 28 days or to discharge or death.

RESULTS: Among 1538 patients who were randomized, 1461 patients (95%) were included in the primary analysis (median age, 1.8 years; 47.3% girls), in which there were 728 patients randomized to the fresh red blood cell group and 733 to the standard-issue group. The median storage duration was 5 days (interquartile range [IQR], 4-6 days) in the fresh group vs 18 days (IQR, 12-25 days) in the standard-issue group (P < .001). There were no significant differences in new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome between fresh (147 of 728 [20.2%]) and standard-issue red blood cell groups (133 of 732 [18.2%]), with an unadjusted absolute risk difference of 2.0% (95% CI, -2.0% to 6.1%; P = .33). The prevalence of sepsis was 25.8% (160 of 619) in the fresh group and 25.3% (154 of 608) in the standard-issue group. The prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome was 6.6% (41 of 619) in the fresh group and 4.8% (29 of 608) in the standard-issue group. Intensive care unit mortality was 4.5% (33 of 728) in the fresh group vs 3.5 % (26 of 732) in the standard-issue group (P = .34).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among critically ill pediatric patients, the use of fresh red blood cells did not reduce the incidence of new or progressive multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (including mortality) compared with standard-issue red blood cells.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01977547.

PMID:31821429 | PMC:PMC7081749 | DOI:10.1001/jama.2019.17478

Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2019 May;30(3):341-347. doi: 10.1111/pai.13015. Epub 2019 Mar 20.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data about the risk of anaphylaxis recurrence in children are lacking. We assessed anaphylaxis recurrence and medical follow-up in a cohort of children previously hospitalized in a French pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) for anaphylaxis.

METHODS: We conducted a telephone survey of 166 children (≤18 years) hospitalized from 2003 to 2013.

RESULTS: In all, 106 (64%) completed the survey (boys, 59%; mean age [SD]: 15.3 years [5.5]). The main index triggers were drugs (45%) and foods (37%). The mean duration follow-up was of 7.7 years (SD: 2.4). Thirty-eight (36%) children experienced 399 new allergic reactions during a follow-up period of 282 patient-years (incidence rate: 1.4/100 patients/y; 95% CI: 0.64-2.04). Twelve children experienced 19 anaphylaxis reactions including five requiring PICU admission (anaphylaxis recurrence rate: 0.20/100 patients/y; 95% CI non-calculable). Food was the trigger for 79% of recurrent reactions and drugs for 8%. The food trigger was previously known in 83%, the same as the index trigger in 69%. Overall, 1.5% of the recurrent reactions were treated with adrenaline injection and 8% an emergency hospital admission. Patients with recurrence had more likely a history of food allergy (P < 10^-4 ), asthma (P < 0.005), atopic dermatitis (P < 0.05) than those without. 31% of the 50 children with food allergy did not see an allergist, 23% had no adrenaline auto-injector, and 26% lacked a school individual healthcare plan.

CONCLUSIONS: Following a PICU admission for anaphylaxis, recurrence is high in children with food allergy compared with drug allergy. Allergic comorbidities increase the risk. Medical follow-up has to be improved for these at-risk children.

PMID:30589462 | DOI:10.1111/pai.13015

J Crit Care. 2022 Apr;68:165-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Jul 23.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Viral bronchiolitis is a major cause of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission. Insight in the trends of bronchiolitis-associated PICU admissions is limited, but imperative for future PICU resource and capacity planning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied trends in PICU admissions for bronchiolitis in six European sites, including three full national registries, between 2000 and 2019 and calculated population-based estimates per 100,000 children where appropriate. Information concerning risk factors for severe disease and use of invasive mechanical ventilation was also collected when available.

RESULTS: In total, there were 15,606 PICU admissions for bronchiolitis. We observed an increase in the annual number, rate and estimates per 100,000 children of PICU admissions for bronchiolitis at all sites over the last two decades, while the proportion of patients at high risk for severe disease remained relatively stable.

CONCLUSIONS: The international increased burden of bronchiolitis for the PICU is concerning, and warrants further international attention and investigation.

PMID:34304966 | DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.07.009

Arch Pediatr. 2014 Jul;21(7):790-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

ABSTRACT

Minor head trauma is a common cause for pediatric emergency department visits. In 2009, the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) published a clinical prediction rule for identifying children at very low risk of clinically important traumatic brain injuries (ciTBI) and for reducing CT use because of malignancy induced by ionizing radiation. The prediction rule for ciTBI was derived and validated on 42,412 children in a prospective cohort study. The Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence (French Emergency Medicine Society) and the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgences Pédiatriques (French-Language Pediatric Emergency Care Group) recommend this algorithm for the management of children after minor head trauma. Based on clinical variables (history, symptoms, and physical examination findings), the algorithm assists in medical decision-making: CT scan, hospitalization for observation or discharge, according to three levels of ciTBI risk (high, intermediate, or low risk). The prediction rule sensitivity for children younger than 2 years is 100 % [86.3-100] and for those aged 2 years and older it is 96.8 % [89-99.6]. Our aim is to present these new recommendations for the management of children after minor head trauma.

PMID:24935453 | DOI:10.1016/j.arcped.2014.04.015

Arch Pediatr. 2022 May;29(4):326-329. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2022.02.007. Epub 2022 Mar 26.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Due to the lack of available evidence on pediatric trauma care organization, no French national guideline has been developed. This survey aimed to describe the management of pediatric trauma patients in France.

METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey, an electronic questionnaire (previously validated) was distributed to intensive care physicians from tertiary hospitals via the GFRUP (Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgences Pédiatriques) mailing list.

RESULTS: We collected 37 responses from 28 centers with available data, representing 100% of French level-1 pediatric trauma centers. Most of the pediatric centers (n = 21, 75%) had a written local protocol on pediatric trauma care. In most centers (n = 17, 61%), patients with severe trauma could be admitted in various locations, including the adult or pediatric emergency department or the intensive care unit. Usually, the location of the trauma room depended on the patients' age and/or severity of trauma. In 12 centers in which trauma could be managed by adult physicians (n = 12/18, 70%), a physician with pediatric expertise (anesthesiologist or intensive care physician) could be called according to the patient's age or severity of trauma. The cut-off patient age for considering pediatric expertise was mainly 3-5 years (n = 10, 83%).

CONCLUSION: Although most French level-1 pediatric trauma centers have a local protocol for pediatric trauma management, organization is very heterogeneous in France. Guidelines should focus on collaboration between professionals and hospital facilities in order to improve outcomes of children with trauma.

PMID:35351342 | DOI:10.1016/j.arcped.2022.02.007

Acta Paediatr. 2011 Nov;100(11):e227-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02356.x. Epub 2011 Jun 11.

ABSTRACT

AIM: To describe the characteristics of the activities of multifunction paediatric 'short-stay units' (SSU) including observation unit (OU), medical assessment and planning unit (MAPU) and holding unit (HU), to evaluate their effectiveness and to explore predictors of inappropriate admissions for OU patients.

METHODS: Admissions to nine French paediatric SSUs were analysed. The main outcome measures were SSU length of stay with associated outcome for all patients and appropriate admission rate for OU patients.

RESULTS: Of 1084 patients included in the study, 66% were OU patients (n = 718), 21% MAPU patients (n = 225) and 13% HU patients (n = 141). The OU patients constituted the majority of the SSU admissions. The appropriate OU admission rates ranged from 52% to 86%. Head trauma and seizure were the conditions with the highest appropriate OU admission rates (82%). Age <1 year, and need for IV fluids or medications, CT-Scan or MRI and cardiorespiratory monitoring were associated with an increased risk of inappropriate OU admission. Eighteen per cent of the MAPU patients and 5% of the HU patients were discharged home within 24 h.

CONCLUSION: By providing extended and easily available facilities for diagnostics and early treatment for a wide range of sick children, the French paediatric SSU is an effective model for 'observation medicine' in emergency department-managed units. The experience and principles may be applicable to similar units in other health care systems.

PMID:21575056 | DOI:10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02356.x

Ann Intensive Care. 2017 Dec;7(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13613-017-0294-1. Epub 2017 Jun 19.

ABSTRACT

Over the recent period, the use of induced hypothermia has gained an increasing interest for critically ill patients, in particular in brain-injured patients. The term "targeted temperature management" (TTM) has now emerged as the most appropriate when referring to interventions used to reach and maintain a specific level temperature for each individual. TTM may be used to prevent fever, to maintain normothermia, or to lower core temperature. This treatment is widely used in intensive care units, mostly as a primary neuroprotective method. Indications are, however, associated with variable levels of evidence based on inhomogeneous or even contradictory literature. Our aim was to conduct a systematic analysis of the published data in order to provide guidelines. We present herein recommendations for the use of TTM in adult and paediatric critically ill patients developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. These guidelines were conducted by a group of experts from the French Intensive Care Society (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française [SRLF]) and the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société Francaise d'Anesthésie Réanimation [SFAR]) with the participation of the French Emergency Medicine Association (Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence [SFMU]), the French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergencies (Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgences Pédiatriques [GFRUP]), the French National Association of Neuro-Anesthesiology and Critical Care (Association Nationale de Neuro-Anesthésie Réanimation Française [ANARLF]), and the French Neurovascular Society (Société Française Neurovasculaire [SFNV]). Fifteen experts and two coordinators agreed to consider questions concerning TTM and its practical implementation in five clinical situations: cardiac arrest, traumatic brain injury, stroke, other brain injuries, and shock. This resulted in 30 recommendations: 3 recommendations were strong (Grade 1), 13 were weak (Grade 2), and 14 were experts' opinions. After two rounds of rating and various amendments, a strong agreement from voting participants was obtained for all 30 (100%) recommendations, which are exposed in the present article.

PMID:28631089 | PMC:PMC5476556 | DOI:10.1186/s13613-017-0294-1

Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2018 Oct;37(5):481-491. doi: 10.1016/j.accpm.2017.06.003. Epub 2017 Jul 5.

ABSTRACT

Over the recent period, the use of induced hypothermia has gained an increasing interest for critically ill patients, in particular in brain-injured patients. The term "targeted temperature management" (TTM) has now emerged as the most appropriate when referring to interventions used to reach and maintain a specific level temperature for each individual. TTM may be used to prevent fever, to maintain normothermia, or to lower core temperature. This treatment is widely used in intensive care units, mostly as a primary neuroprotective method. Indications are, however, associated with variable levels of evidence based on inhomogeneous or even contradictory literature. Our aim was to conduct a systematic analysis of the published data in order to provide guidelines. We present herein recommendations for the use of TTM in adult and paediatric critically ill patients developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) method. These guidelines were conducted by a group of experts from the French Intensive Care Society (Société de réanimation de langue française [SRLF]) and the French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société francaise d'anesthésie réanimation [SFAR]) with the participation of the French Emergency Medicine Association (Société française de médecine d'urgence [SFMU]), the French Group for Pediatric Intensive Care and Emergencies (Groupe francophone de réanimation et urgences pédiatriques [GFRUP]), the French National Association of Neuro-Anesthesiology and Critical Care (Association nationale de neuro-anesthésie réanimation française [ANARLF]), and the French Neurovascular Society (Société française neurovasculaire [SFNV]). Fifteen experts and two coordinators agreed to consider questions concerning TTM and its practical implementation in five clinical situations: cardiac arrest, traumatic brain injury, stroke, other brain injuries, and shock. This resulted in 30 recommendations: 3 recommendations were strong (Grade 1), 13 were weak (Grade 2), and 14 were experts' opinions. After two rounds of rating and various amendments, a strong agreement from voting participants was obtained for all 30 (100%) recommendations, which are exposed in the present article.

PMID:28688998 | DOI:10.1016/j.accpm.2017.06.003