Résultat de votre recherche

Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Nov 23;10(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00762-9.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Poisoning is one of the leading causes of admission to the emergency department and intensive care unit. A large number of epidemiological changes have occurred over the last years such as the exponential growth of new synthetic psychoactive substances. Major progress has also been made in analytical screening and assays, enabling the clinicians to rapidly obtain a definite diagnosis.

METHODS: A committee composed of 30 experts from five scientific societies, the Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF), the Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence (SFMU), the Société de Toxicologie Clinique (STC), the Société Française de Toxicologie Analytique (SFTA) and the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d'Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP) evaluated eight fields: (1) severity assessment and initial triage; (2) diagnostic approach and role of toxicological analyses; (3) supportive care; (4) decontamination; (5) elimination enhancement; (6) place of antidotes; (7) specificities related to recreational drug poisoning; and (8) characteristics of cardiotoxicant poisoning. Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Analysis of the literature and formulation of recommendations were then conducted according to the GRADE^® methodology.

RESULTS: The SRLF-SFMU guideline panel provided 41 statements concerning the management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning. Ethanol and chemical poisoning were excluded from the scope of these recommendations. After two rounds of discussion and various amendments, a strong consensus was reached for all recommendations. Six of these recommendations had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1±) and six had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2±). Twenty-nine recommendations were in the form of expert opinion recommendations due to the low evidences in the literature.

CONCLUSIONS: The experts reached a substantial consensus for several strong recommendations for optimal management of pharmaceutical and recreational drug poisoning, mainly regarding the conditions and effectiveness of naloxone and N-acetylcystein as antidotes to treat opioid and acetaminophen poisoning, respectively.

PMID:33226502 | PMC:PMC7683636 | DOI:10.1186/s13613-020-00762-9

Med Mal Infect. 2007 Dec;37 Suppl 3:S194-203. doi: 10.1016/j.medmal.2007.09.005.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:18293503 | PMC:PMC7131670 | DOI:10.1016/j.medmal.2007.09.005

Euro Surveill. 2020 Jun;25(22):2001010. doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.22.2001010.

ABSTRACT

End of April 2020, French clinicians observed an increase in cases presenting with paediatric inflammatory multisystem syndrome (PIMS). Nationwide surveillance was set up and demonstrated temporospatial association with the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic for 156 reported cases as at 17 May: 108 were classified as confirmed (n = 79), probable (n = 16) or possible (n = 13) post-COVID-19 PIMS cases. A continuum of clinical features from Kawasaki-like disease to myocarditis was observed, requiring intensive care in 67% of cases.

PMID:32524957 | PMC:PMC7336112 | DOI:10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.22.2001010

Ann Intensive Care. 2012 Nov 9;2(1):46. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-2-46.

ABSTRACT

Intensivists are regularly confronted with the question of gastrointestinal bleeding. To date, the latest international recommendations regarding prevention and treatment for gastrointestinal bleeding lack a specific approach to the critically ill patients. We present recommendations for management by the intensivist of gastrointestinal bleeding in adults and children, developed with the GRADE system by an experts group of the French-Language Society of Intensive Care (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF), with the participation of the French Language Group of Paediatric Intensive Care and Emergencies (GFRUP), the French Society of Emergency Medicine (SFMU), the French Society of Gastroenterology (SNFGE), and the French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED). The recommendations cover five fields of application: management of gastrointestinal bleeding before endoscopic diagnosis, treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding unrelated to portal hypertension, treatment of upper gastrointestinal bleeding related to portal hypertension, management of presumed lower gastrointestinal bleeding, and prevention of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in intensive care.

PMID:23140348 | PMC:PMC3526517 | DOI:10.1186/2110-5820-2-46

Crit Care. 2021 Apr 12;25(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03562-0.

NO ABSTRACT

PMID:33845883 | PMC:PMC8040196 | DOI:10.1186/s13054-021-03562-0

Arch Pediatr. 2005 Oct;12(10):1501-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2005.04.085. Epub 2005 Jun 2.

ABSTRACT

Several recent French studies have revealed that 40% of death in pediatric intensive care units are associated with withdrawal or limitation of life saving treatments. Because such decisions are common, the Groupe francophone de réanimation et urgences pédiatriques (GFRUP) has decided to publish recommendations in order to help paediatricians dealing with those difficult issues and to improve their decisions. In a first part of the document the ethical principles that imply those guidelines are recalled, followed by definitions of the terms currently employed. The second part contains guidelines regarding decision making process, the way it is applied and organisation of relatives as well as paramedical and medical staff support when the death of a child occurs.

PMID:15935627 | DOI:10.1016/j.arcped.2005.04.085

Arch Pediatr. 2021 May;28(4):325-337. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2021.03.004. Epub 2021 Apr 16.

ABSTRACT

In 2005, the French-speaking task force on pediatric critical and emergency care [Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et d'Urgences Pédiatriques (GFRUP)] issued recommendations on withholding and withdrawing treatments in pediatric critical care. Since then, the French Public Health Code, modified by the laws passed in 2005 and 2016 and by their enactment decrees, has established a legal framework for practice. Now, 15 years later, an update of these recommendations was needed to factor in the experience acquired by healthcare teams, new questions raised by practice surveys, the recommendations issued in the interval, the changes in legislation, and a few legal precedents. The objective of this article is to help pediatric critical care teams find the closest possible compromise between the ethical principles guiding the care offered to the child and the family and compliance with current regulations and laws.

PMID:33875345 | DOI:10.1016/j.arcped.2021.03.004

Ann Intensive Care. 2012 Aug 28;2(1):42. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-2-42.

ABSTRACT

Thrombocytopenia is a very frequent disorder in the intensive care unit. Many etiologies should be searched, and therapeutic approaches differ according to these different causes. However, no guideline exists regarding optimum practices for these situations in critically ill patients. We present recommendations for the management of thrombocytopenia in intensive care unit, excluding pregnancy, developed by an expert group of the French-Language Society of Intensive Care (Société de Réanimation de Langue Française (SRLF), the French Language Group of Paediatric Intensive Care and Emergencies (GFRUP) and of the Haemostasis and Thrombosis Study Group (GEHT) of the French Society of Haematology (SFH). The recommendations cover six fields of application: definition, epidemiology, and prognosis; diagnostic approach; therapeutic aspects; thrombocytopenia and sepsis; iatrogenic thrombocytopenia, with a special focus on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia; and thrombotic microangiopathy.

PMID:22929300 | PMC:PMC3488545 | DOI:10.1186/2110-5820-2-42

Arch Pediatr. 2014 Jul;21(7):790-6. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2014.04.015. Epub 2014 Jun 13.

ABSTRACT

Minor head trauma is a common cause for pediatric emergency department visits. In 2009, the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network (PECARN) published a clinical prediction rule for identifying children at very low risk of clinically important traumatic brain injuries (ciTBI) and for reducing CT use because of malignancy induced by ionizing radiation. The prediction rule for ciTBI was derived and validated on 42,412 children in a prospective cohort study. The Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence (French Emergency Medicine Society) and the Groupe Francophone de Réanimation et Urgences Pédiatriques (French-Language Pediatric Emergency Care Group) recommend this algorithm for the management of children after minor head trauma. Based on clinical variables (history, symptoms, and physical examination findings), the algorithm assists in medical decision-making: CT scan, hospitalization for observation or discharge, according to three levels of ciTBI risk (high, intermediate, or low risk). The prediction rule sensitivity for children younger than 2 years is 100 % [86.3-100] and for those aged 2 years and older it is 96.8 % [89-99.6]. Our aim is to present these new recommendations for the management of children after minor head trauma.

PMID:24935453 | DOI:10.1016/j.arcped.2014.04.015

Arch Dis Child. 2019 Apr;104(4):322-327. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314658. Epub 2018 Jun 2.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine paediatric hospital preparedness for a mass casualty disaster involving children in both prehospital and hospital settings. The study findings will serve to generate recommendations, guidelines and training objectives.

DESIGN AND SETTING: The AMAVI-PED study is a cross-sectional survey. An electronic questionnaire was sent to French physicians with key roles in specialised paediatric acute care.

RESULTS: In total, 81% (26 of 32) of French University Hospitals were represented in the study. A disaster plan AMAVI with a specific paediatric emphasis was established in all the paediatric centres. In case of a mass casualty event, paediatric victims would be initially admitted to the paediatric emergency department for most centres (n=21; 75%). Paediatric anaesthesiologists, paediatric surgeons and paediatric radiologists were in-house in 20 (71%), 5 (18%) and 12 (43%) centres, respectively. Twenty-three (82%) hospitals had a paediatric specialised mobile intensive care unit and seven (25%) of these could provide a prehospital emergency response. Didactic teaching and simulation exercises were implemented in 20 (71%) and 22 (79%) centres, respectively. Overall, physician participants rated the level of readiness of their hospital as 6 (IQR: 5-7) on a 10-point readiness scale.

CONCLUSION: Paediatric preparedness is very heterogeneous between the centres. Based on the study findings, we suggest that a national programme must be defined and guidelines generated.

PMID:29860227 | DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2017-314658