Résultat de votre recherche

Increasing burden of viral bronchiolitis in the pediatric intensive care unit; an observational study

J Crit Care. 2022 Apr;68:165-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.07.009. Epub 2021 Jul 23.

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Viral bronchiolitis is a major cause of pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) admission. Insight in the trends of bronchiolitis-associated PICU admissions is limited, but imperative for future PICU resource and capacity planning.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively studied trends in PICU admissions for bronchiolitis in six European sites, including three full national registries, between 2000 and 2019 and calculated population-based estimates per 100,000 children where appropriate. Information concerning risk factors for severe disease and use of invasive mechanical ventilation was also collected when available.

RESULTS: In total, there were 15,606 PICU admissions for bronchiolitis. We observed an increase in the annual number, rate and estimates per 100,000 children of PICU admissions for bronchiolitis at all sites over the last two decades, while the proportion of patients at high risk for severe disease remained relatively stable.

CONCLUSIONS: The international increased burden of bronchiolitis for the PICU is concerning, and warrants further international attention and investigation.

PMID:34304966 | DOI:10.1016/j.jcrc.2021.07.009

Date de publication
Identifiant
pubmed:34304966

Disaster preparedness in French paediatric hospitals 2 years after terrorist attacks of 2015

Arch Dis Child. 2019 Apr;104(4):322-327. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314658. Epub 2018 Jun 2.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to determine paediatric hospital preparedness for a mass casualty disaster involving children in both prehospital and hospital settings. The study findings will serve to generate recommendations, guidelines and training objectives.

DESIGN AND SETTING: The AMAVI-PED study is a cross-sectional survey. An electronic questionnaire was sent to French physicians with key roles in specialised paediatric acute care.

RESULTS: In total, 81% (26 of 32) of French University Hospitals were represented in the study. A disaster plan AMAVI with a specific paediatric emphasis was established in all the paediatric centres. In case of a mass casualty event, paediatric victims would be initially admitted to the paediatric emergency department for most centres (n=21; 75%). Paediatric anaesthesiologists, paediatric surgeons and paediatric radiologists were in-house in 20 (71%), 5 (18%) and 12 (43%) centres, respectively. Twenty-three (82%) hospitals had a paediatric specialised mobile intensive care unit and seven (25%) of these could provide a prehospital emergency response. Didactic teaching and simulation exercises were implemented in 20 (71%) and 22 (79%) centres, respectively. Overall, physician participants rated the level of readiness of their hospital as 6 (IQR: 5-7) on a 10-point readiness scale.

CONCLUSION: Paediatric preparedness is very heterogeneous between the centres. Based on the study findings, we suggest that a national programme must be defined and guidelines generated.

PMID:29860227 | DOI:10.1136/archdischild-2017-314658

Date de publication
Identifiant
pubmed:29860227

Management of intussusception in France in 2004: investigation of the Paediatric Infectious Diseases Group, the French Group of Paediatric Emergency and Reanimation, and the French Society of Paediatric Surgery

Arch Pediatr. 2006 Dec;13(12):1581-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2006.10.009. Epub 2006 Nov 27.

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the different pathways of management of intussusception (IS) in infants and children in metropolitan France and to identify paediatric emergency centres that might constitute a surveillance network for IS.

MATERIAL AND METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 273 paediatric emergency centres distributed across France in 2005. Modalities of diagnosis and treatment of IS had to be precised.

RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-seven centres (61.2%) responded. The response was given by 131 paediatricians (78.4%) and 36 surgeons (21.6%) working in 38 universitary hospitals (22.7%) and 129 general hospitals (77.2%). The mean number of IS treated in each centre in 2004 was 11+/-13.5 (extr. 0 to 70; median 6). Diagnosis of IS required a collaboration between medical and surgical teams in 51.5% of the centres, but in 40.1% the sole medical team was in charge of the diagnosis. Ultrasonography is used for diagnosis by 98.8% of the centres. Reduction with hydrostatic enema and eventually surgery was performed in the same hospital in 44.3%. Other centres systematically or frequently transferred the patients for reduction, mostly towards universitary hospitals (90%).

CONCLUSION: The procedures of IS diagnosis are the same everywhere in France but the pathways of therapeutic management do vary, depending on the availability of surgeons and anaesthetists trained in paediatrics on each site. These disparities will probably change with the implementation of the new plan for sanitary organization in children and adolescents in France. Labellized paediatric emergency centres will gather more surgical patients and could eventually constitute an effective surveillance network for IS.

PMID:17125980 | DOI:10.1016/j.arcped.2006.10.009

Date de publication
Identifiant
pubmed:17125980